As Philbrick writes, “Samuel Adams and his compatriots had created what was, in essence, an extralegal, colony-wide network of communications that threatened to preempt old hierarchical form of government.”īut the most interesting lesson was that, even though the American Revolution might have been partly kindled by social networks, it was taken over and won by militias. The affair of the purloined Hutchinson Letters reminded me of WikiLeaks, the rides of Paul Revere and William Dawes reminded me of Twitter, and the Tea Party reminded me of, well, the tea party. The Committees of Correspondence conjured up comparisons to the role played in Tahrir Square by Facebook and other social networks.
When reading “Bunker Hill,” Nathaniel Philbrick’s vivid narrative of the Boston area militia skirmishes that sparked the American Revolution in 1775, I couldn’t help thinking about more contemporary revolutions.
0 kommentar(er)
